Department of Health and Human Services | Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration |
Florida District 555 Winderley Place, Suite 200 Maitland, Florida 32751 Telephone: 407-475-4700 FAX: 407-475-4770 |
You must have a HACCP plan that, at a minimum, lists the critical limits that must be met to comply with 21 CFR 123.6(c)(3). A critical limit is defined in 21 CFR 123.3 (c) as "the maximum or minimum value to which a physical, biological, or chemical parameter must be controlled at a critical control point to prevent, eliminate, or reduce to an acceptable level the occurrence of the identified food safety hazard." However, your firm’s HACCP plan for RTE cold smoked salmon products lists a critical limit, (b)(4) at the smoking CCP that is not adequate to control the significant hazard of pathogen growth, including C. botulinum, in that the minimum and maximum time periods referenced in the critical limit are not specific to the various sizes of RTE cold smoked salmon products manufactured by your firm (e.g., 1-2, 1-3, 2-2.5, 2-3, 3-4, and 4-5 lbs. size fillets).
You must have a HACCP plan that, at a minimum, lists monitoring procedures and their frequency for each critical control point, to comply with 21 CFR 123.6 (c) (4). However, your firm’s HACCP plan for RTE cold smoked salmon products lists monitoring procedures at the curing and smoking critical control points that are not adequate to control pathogen growth and toxin formation, including C. botulinum. Specifically:
A. The monitoring procedure for the curing critical control point states in part, (b)(4) Validate post smoke w/lab." However, the documentation you provided to us during the inspection was inadequate in that “CURED SALMON VALIDATION STUDY” makes no reference to minimum curing times and “PROCESS SPECIFICATION: Scientific Study” indicates a minimum cure time of (b)(4) but only for 3-4 lbs. size fillets and not for any of the other sizes of RTE cold smoked salmon products manufactured by your firm (e.g., 1-2, 1-3, 2-2.5, 2-3, and 4-5 lbs. size fillets).
B. The monitoring procedure for the smoking critical control point states, “Smoke room temp [,]” although the critical limit for the smoking critical control point lists time (b)(4) as well as temperature (b)(4) as factors to be monitored in the smoking process.
Because you chose to include a corrective action plan in your HACCP plan, your described corrective actions must be appropriate to comply with 21 CFR 123.7(b). However, your corrective action plan for RTE cold smoked salmon products at the curing CCP to control the significant hazard of pathogen growth, including C. botulinum, (b)(4) is not appropriate in that the adequacy of the proposed corrective action to regain control over the critical limit deviation has not been established by a scientific study.
You must take an appropriate corrective action when a deviation from a critical limit occurs to comply with 21 CFR 123.7(a). However, your firm did not take a corrective action to control the significant hazard of pathogen growth and toxin formation, including C. botulinum, when your process for RTE salmon products deviated from your critical limits at the curing and smoking critical control point. Specifically, our review of your firm’s batch records for RTE smoked salmon products revealed that for seventeen (17) out of forty-three (43) processing days between August 17, 2010, and February 18, 2011, your firm took no corrective action when the recorded product curing and smoking times failed to comply with the following minimum and maximum curing and smoking time schedule being followed by your firm (as verbally provided to our Investigators by Jason A. Alonen, Vice President of Hickory Smokehouse Miami, Inc.):
size of fillet (pounds) | minimum time (hours) | maximum time (hours) | |
(b)(4) | (b)(4) | (b)(4) | |
(b)(4) | (b)(4) | (b)(4) | |
(b)(4) | (b)(4) | (b)(4) | |
| (b)(4) | (b)(4) | |
(b)(4) | (b)(4) | (b)(4) |
You must conduct food manufacturing operations under such conditions and controls as are necessary to minimize the contamination of food to comply with 21 CFR 110.80(b)(2). However, your firm was not rinsing the acidified sodium chlorite solution off of your RTE smoked salmon products prior to packaging although the technical data sheet your firm received from the distributor of the solution states, “(b)(4).” See 21 CFR 173.325(d).
You must monitor sanitation conditions and practices during processing with sufficient frequency to ensure compliance with current good manufacturing practice requirements in 21 CFR Part 110 to comply with 21 CFR 123.11(b). However, your firm did not monitor Prevention of cross-contamination from insanitary objects to food, food packaging material, and other food contact surfaces, including utensils, gloves, and outer garments, and from raw product to cooked product; Condition and cleanliness of food contact surfaces, including utensils, gloves, and outer garments; Protection of food, food packaging material, and food contact surfaces from adulteration with lubricants, fuel, pesticides, cleaning compounds, sanitizing agents, condensate, and other chemical, physical, and biological contaminants. As evidenced by:
We also note your firm indicates usage of a (b)(4) for the reduction of bacteria in the water supply. This is considered to be a high limit for the water supply. We note in the Sanitation Control Procedures for Processing Fish and Fishery Products (First edition 2000- page 2-21) - for chlorine levels in plant water 3-10 ppm. The higher end indicates the maximum permitted without a required rinse and surfaces must drain.
FDA acknowledges receipt of Hickory House’s response to the Form FDA 483, Inspectional Observations (FDA 483), issued to Hickory Smokehouse Miami, Inc., at the close of the current inspection. In the response to the FDA 483, which was signed by Jason A. Alonen, Vice President, Mr. Alonen stated that Hickory House would be hiring a consultant to assist your firm in correcting a majority of the seafood HACCP observations listed on the FDA 483 and that the food CGMP observations had already been corrected or would be corrected by the end of May 2011. He also stated that your firm was actively working on having someone at the firm trained in seafood HACCP before July 1, 2011. However, because you failed to include any documentation to support your corrective actions, we cannot evaluate the adequacy of your response.
- Your product does not express calories from fat to the nearest 10-calorie increment when greater than 50 calories as required by 21 CFR 101.9(c)(1)(ii). Your product declares Calories from fat as 81.
- Your product failed to bear a statement of the number of grams of Trans Fat in accordance with 21 CFR 101.9(c)(2)(ii).
- Your product failed to declare the Servings Per Container as required by 21 CFR 101.9(d)(3)(ii).
No comments:
Post a Comment