Search Warning Letters

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Western Milling Company 7/6/10

 

Department of Health and Human Services logoDepartment of Health and Human Services

Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
 Los Angeles District
Pacific Region
19701 Fairchild
Irvine, CA 92612-2506
Telephone: 949-608-2900
FAX: 949-608-4415 

WARNING LETTER


CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED


July 6, 2010

W/L 28-10


Mr. Kevin H. Kruse, President
O.H. Kruse Grain & Milling Company / Western Milling Company
31120 Nutmeg Road
Goshen, California 93227


Dear Mr. Kruse:


A comprehensive inspection / for-cause investigation of your non-FDA licensed feed manufacturing facility called Western Milling Company, located at 310 South 24th Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, was conducted by an Investigator from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between March 18 and March 31 of 2010. The inspection occurred as part of the investigation of a complaint made by a local dairy farm. During this inspection, significant deviations from the Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) regulations for medicated feeds, Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 225 (21 C.F.R. 225), were observed. Such deviations caused the animal feed being manufactured at this facility to be adulterated within the meaning of section 501(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), 21 U.S.C. § 351(a)(2)(B). In addition, several labeling deviations were observed that cause certain animal feed products manufactured by your firm to be misbranded foods under section 403(a)(1) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 342(a)(1).


The U. S. Food and Drug Administration's inspection found that your firm failed to implement adequate safeguards to prevent unsafe contamination in the production of medicated and nonmedicated feeds, per Title 21 C.F.R. 225.165. For example our written cleanout procedure directs mill employees to use (b)(4) as a flush following the manufacture of a medicated feed. The written cleanout procedure mentions "sequencing" but does not explain what sequencing is and does not contain a written sequencing plan. We do not believe this is a sufficient amount of direction to be effective.


We also found that not all deliveries of medicated animal feeds are adequately labeled to assure that the feed can be properly used by the consignee, 21 C.F.R. 225.180. Specifically, we found a number of customer-formula medicated feeds whose label did not contain the directions-for-use or other information relative to the medication that is required by the drug approval regulations.

For example, one product we looked at, a dairy feed containing (b)(4) which was manufactured on (b)(4) had a delivery invoice and a "LOAD IT SHEET" accompanying the shipment. However, neither document contained all of the required drug information, including directions-for-use, as required by 21 C.F.R 558.355.

The above is not intended as an all-inclusive list of violations. As an animal feed manufacturer of medicated and non-medicated feeds, you are responsible for ensuring that your overall operation and the products you manufacture and distribute are in compliance with the Act and its implementing regulations.

The specific violations noted in this letter and in the Inspectional Observations form (the FDA Form 483), issued at the close-out of the inspection, may be symptomatic of serious problems in your firm's manufacturing and quality assurance systems. You should investigate and determine the cause of the violations, take prompt actions to connect the violations and prevent their recurrence, and to bring your products into compliance. Failure to achieve prompt corrective action may result in regulatory action, without further notice, such as seizure and/or injunction.


We are in receipt of your letter responding to the FDA Form 483 (dated (b)(4)), signed (b)(6) by Included was a copy of the invoice from the scale service company showing that the scales have been serviced and certified. Also included was a copy of a label for a customer-formula medicated feed that contains (b)(4) and is labeled for dairy cows. The label information regarding (b)(4) is incorrect and still needs some additional work.


Although it appears from the response that you are working toward correcting the deviations noted at your facility, you must adequately implement and maintain each corrective action to ensure its effectiveness.


You should notify this office within fifteen (15) business days of receiving this letter of the steps you have taken to achieve and maintain compliance with the law. Your response should include an explanation of each step being taken to correct the violations noted in this letter. If corrective action cannot be completed within 15 business days, state the reason for the delay and the date by which the corrections will be completed. Include copies of any available documentation demonstrating that corrections have been made.

Please send your response to:


Blake Bevill
Director of Compliance Branch
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
19701 Fairchild
Irvine, California 92612-2506

Sincerely,
/S/
Director
Los Angeles District Office

-

Triple G Dairy 7/6/10

  

Department of Health and Human Services' logoDepartment of Health and Human Services

Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
 Los Angeles District
Pacific Region
19701 Fairchild
Irvine, CA 92612-2506
Telephone: 949-608-2900
FAX: 949-608-4415

WARNING LETTER


CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED


W/L 29-10

July 6, 2010

Ben Gingg
Triple G Dairy
29115 W. Broadway Road
Buckeye, Arizona 85326-6447

Dear Mr. Gingg:

On March 22 - 30, 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted an investigation of your dairy operation located at 29115 W. Broadway Road, Buckeye, Arizona. This letter notifies you of the violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that we found during our investigation of your operation. You can find the Act and its associated regulations on the Intemet through links on the FDA's web page at  www.fda.gov.

We found that you offered for sale an animal for slaughter as food that was adulterated. Under section 402(a)(2)(C)(ii) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 342(a)(2)(C)(ii), a food is deemed to be adulterated if it bears or contains a new animal drug that is unsafe under section 512 of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 360b. Further, under section 402(a)(4) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 342(a)(4), a food is deemed to be adulterated if it has been held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health.

Specifically, our investigation revealed that on or about January 4, 2010, you sold a dairy cow, identified by back tag (b)(4), for slaughter as food. On or about January 5, 2010, (b)(4), slaughtered this animal. United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA/FSIS) analysis of tissue samples collected from this animal identified the presence of 0.76 parts per million (ppm) of sulfadimethoxine residue in the liver. FDA has established a tolerance of 0.1 ppm for residues of sulfadimethoxine in the uncooked edible tissues of cattle as codified in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 556.640 (21 C.F.R. 556.640). The presence of this drug in edible tissue from this animal in this amount causes the food to be adulterated within the meaning of section 402(a)(2)(C)(ii) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 342(a)(2)(C)(ii).

Our investigation also found that you hold animals under conditions that are so inadequate that medicated animals bearing potentially harmful drug residues are likely to enter the food supply. For example, you failed to maintain complete treatment records. The treatment record for cow (b)(4) (back tag (b)(4)) does not indicate meat/milk withhold times, route of administration, nor the identity of the individual who administered treatment. Food from animals held under such conditions is adulterated within the meaning of section 402(a)(4) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 342(a)(4).

We also found that you adulterated the new animal drug Albon (sulfadimethoxine) boluses. Specifically, our investigation revealed that you did not use Albon (sulfadimethoxine) boluses as directed by its approved labeling. Use of this drug in this manner is an extralabel use. 21 C.F.R.
530.3(a).

The extralabel use of approved animal or human drugs in animals is allowed under the Act only if the extralabel use complies with sections 512(a)(4) and (5) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 360b(a)(4) and (5), and 21 C.F.R. Part 530, including that the use must be by or on the lawful order of a
licensed veterinarian within the context of a valid veterinarian/client/patient relationship.

Our investigation found that you, or a designated employee, administered Albon (sulfadimethoxine) boluses to the cow identified by back tag (b)(4) without following the indications and dosing instructions as stated in the approved labeling. Sulfadimethoxine is prohibited for extralabel use in lactating dairy cattle by 21 C.F.R. 530.41(a)(9), and your extralabel use of sulfadimethoxine resulted in an illegal drug residue, in violation of 21 C.F.R. 530.11(d). Because your extralabel use of this drug was not in conformance with its approved labeling and did not comply with 21 C.F.R. Part 530, you caused the drug to be unsafe under section 512(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 360b(a), and adulterated within the meaning of section 501(a)(5) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 351(a)(5).

The above is not intended to be an all-inclusive list of violations. As a producer of animals offered for use as food, you are responsible for ensuring that your overall operation and the food you distribute are in compliance with the law.

You should take prompt action to correct the violations described in this letter and to establish procedures to ensure these violations do not recur. Failure to do so may result in regulatory action without further notice such as seizure and/or injunction.

You should notify this office in writing of the steps you have taken to bring your firm into compliance with the law within fifteen (15) working days of receiving this letter. Your response should include each step that has been taken or will be taken to correct the violations and prevent their recurrence. If corrective action cannot be completed within fifteen (15) working days, state the reason for the delay and the time frame within which the corrections will be completed. Please include copies of any available documentation demonstrating that corrections have been made.

Please send your written response to:

Blake Bevill
Director, Compliance Branch
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
19701 Fairchild
Irvine, Califomia 92612.

If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Compliance Officer Brullo at (949) 608-2918; email raymond.brullo@fda.hhs.gov.


Sincerely,

/s/

District Director
Los Angeles District

-

Triple G Dairy - Close out letter

-
-

Country Road Veterinary Services LLC

  

Department of Health and Human Services logoDepartment of Health and Human Services

Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
 Cincinnati District Office
Central Region
6751 Steger Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45237-3097
Telephone: (513) 679-2700
FAX: (513) 679-2771

 

July 6, 2010

WARNING LETTER
CIN-10-107809-16

VIA United Parcel Service

 

Gary L. Topp, D.V.M., Co-Owner
Country Road Veterinary Services, L.L.C.
6732 Dover Road
Apple Creek, Ohio 44606

Dear Dr. Topp,

On January 26 and February 2, 2010, Investigators from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted an investigation in regard to the use of drugs in your veterinary practice. That investigation revealed that you caused the new animal drug, sulfamethoxazole, to be unsafe under section 512(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), 21 U.S.C. § 360b(a), and adulterated within the meaning of section 501(a)(5) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 351(a)(5), because the drug was used in a manner that did not conform with its approved uses or with the regulations for Extralabel Drug Use in Animals, Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 530 (21 C.F.R. Part 530). You can find the Act and its associated regulations on the Internet through links on the FDA's web page at www.fda.gov.

The extralabel use of approved veterinary or human drugs in animals is permitted only if it complies with sections 512(a)(4) and 512(a)(5) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360b(a)(4) and § 360b(a)(5), and the implementing regulations at 21 C.F.R. Part 530. Our investigation found that you failed to comply with these requirements in that you prescribed sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim tablets (800 mg/160 mg per tablet) in an extralabel manner to a calf without meeting the requirements of21 C.F.R. Part 530.

Your prescription for extralabel use of this drug did not meet the requirements of21 C.F.R. 530.12(c) and (e) which require that any animal drug prescribed and dispensed for extralabel use by a veterinarian shall bear or be accompanied by labeling information adequate to assure the safe and proper use of the product. The required labeling information includes:

(1) Any directions for use specified by the veterinarian, including the identification of the animal, condition to be treated, dosage, frequency, route of administration, and duration of therapy; and,

(2) The veterinarian's specified withdrawal time for meat which might be derived from the treated animal.

Your prescription for extralabel use also did not meet the requirements of 21 C.F.R. 530.20(a)(2)(iv), which requires that prior to prescribing or dispensing an approved new animal drug for an extralabel use in food animals, the veterinarian must take appropriate measures to assure that assigned timeframes for withdrawal are met and no illegal residues occur in any food-producing animals subject to extralabel treatment.

Because the drug, sulfamethoxazole was prescribed and used in a manner that did not conform with its approved uses or in compliance with 21 CFR Part 530, you caused the drug to be unsafe under section 512(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 360b(a), and adulterated within the meaning of section 501(a)(5) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 351(a)(5).

The above is not intended to be an all-inclusive list of violations. You and your partners are responsible for complying with the requirements of the Act, including the extralabel use regulations promulgated under the Act. You should take prompt action to correct the above violations and to establish procedures whereby such violations do not recur. Failure to do so may result in regulatory action without further notice, such as seizure and/or injunction.

You should notify this office in writing within fifteen (15) working days of receiving this letter of the specific steps you have taken to correct the noted violations, including an explanation of each step being taken to prevent the recurrence of similar violations. If corrective action cannot be completed within fifteen (15) working days of receiving this letter, state the reason for the delay and the time frame within which the corrections will be completed. Also, include copies of any available documentation demonstrating that corrections have been made.

Your written response should be sent to Mark E. Parmon, Compliance Officer, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 6751 Steger Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45237. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Compliance Officer Mark E. Parmon at (513) 679-2700, Ext. 162, or via email at mark.parmon@fda.hhs.gov.

Sincerely,

/S/
Teresa C. Thompson
District Director
Cincinnati District

cc: Dr. Tony Forshey, Acting Chief
Ohio Department of Agriculture
8995 East Main Street
Reynoldsburg, OH 43068-3399

Atlee W. Hostetler
1553 Harrison Road
Apple Creek, Ohio 44606

-